Burdensome taxes/fees on cannabis could backfire

Legal recreational use of marijuana expected to triple the general fund of some municipals.

Share with:

Reuters: Over taxation on recreational marijuana will fuel black markers, pushing businesses to decamp. key California cities general expected to triple.

More than 60 local marijuana measures will appear on ballots across California in Tuesday’s election. In Monterey, a scenic county along the state’s rugged central coast, officials said new local marijuana taxes and fees, if approved, could bring in $30 million, nearly double the county’ $16 million budget deficit.

Desert Hot Springs’ current general fund is about $15 million. But city leaders project marijuana tax collections could reach $1 million next year and, eventually, climb to $50 million if all the available land gets fully built out.

Proposition 64 would impose state taxes on the cultivation and sale of marijuana. But it also allows local jurisdictions to add taxes of their own, something many cities and counties said they plan to do.

Economists warn that burdensome taxes and fees on the nascent industry could backfire, fueling the black market and pushing marijuana businesses to decamp for towns where it’s cheaper to operate. For many city and county officials across California, however, the promise of new revenue to fill budget gaps and fund services is too alluring to pass up.

Source/ By Robin Respaut\

Share with:

Liked it? Take a second to support Cactusthorns on Patreon!

Leave a Reply

One Response to Burdensome taxes/fees on cannabis could backfire

  1. Avatar
    Jeff Sessions November 26, 2017 at 10:29 am

    “The Board shall not make any grants to local governments which have banned the cultivation, including personal cultivation under Section 11362.2(b)(3) of the Health and Safety Code [outdoors upon the grounds of a private residence], or retail sale of marijuana or marijuana products.” In other words, by Banning Retail sales and or BANNING OUTDOOR CULTIVATION FOR PERSONAL “adult use” or MMJ patients NO SHARE OF STATE COLLECTED REVENUES. This follows the precedent set in Oregon AND IS FAIR!


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.